Member-only story

The Crime of Aggression: A Comprehensive Overview

Isaac Asimov

·12.3k Followers· Follow

Published in The Crime Of Aggression: The Quest For Justice In An Age Of Drones Cyberattacks Insurgents And Autocrats (Human Rights And Crimes Against Humanity 36)

5 min read

581 View Claps

61 Respond

Save

Listen

The crime of aggression is a serious violation of international law that has the potential to cause widespread death, destruction, and suffering. It is defined as the planning, preparation, initiation, or execution of an act of aggression by a state against another state. Aggression is a term that has been used to describe a wide range of acts, including the use of force, the threat of force, and other forms of coercion.

The crime of aggression is a relatively new crime in international law. It was first recognized as a crime by the Nuremberg Tribunal, which was established to prosecute the leaders of Nazi Germany after World War II. The Nuremberg Tribunal defined aggression as "the planning or preparation to wage war against another state, or the use of force against another state for any purpose other than self-defense."

The Crime of Aggression: The Quest for Justice in an Age of Drones, Cyberattacks, Insurgents, and Autocrats (Human Rights and Crimes against Humanity Book 36)

by Julio Franco Corzo

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	999 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	363 pages

The crime of aggression was also included in the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court (ICC). The ICC is a permanent court that has jurisdiction over individuals who are accused of committing genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. The ICC's definition of aggression is similar to the Nuremberg Tribunal's definition, but it also includes the use of force by a state against another state's territory or population.

The Legal Framework for the Crime of Aggression

The legal framework for the crime of aggression is complex and evolving. There are a number of different treaties and conventions that deal with the crime of aggression, including the Nuremberg Charter, the Rome Statute, and the UN Charter. These treaties and conventions provide a general framework for defining and prosecuting the crime of aggression. However, there are still a number of unresolved issues, such as the definition of aggression and the scope of the ICC's jurisdiction.

One of the most important issues that needs to be resolved is the definition of aggression. The Nuremberg Tribunal's definition of aggression is broad and ambiguous, and it has been criticized for being too vague. The ICC's definition of aggression is more specific, but it still leaves some room for interpretation.

Another important issue that needs to be resolved is the scope of the ICC's jurisdiction. The ICC only has jurisdiction over individuals who are accused of committing genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. This means that the ICC cannot prosecute states for the crime of aggression. However, the ICC can prosecute individuals who are accused of committing the crime of aggression, even if the state that they are acting on behalf of is not a party to the Rome Statute.

The Challenges of Prosecuting the Crime of Aggression

There are a number of challenges to prosecuting the crime of aggression. One of the biggest challenges is the difficulty of gathering evidence. The crime of aggression is often planned and executed in secret, and it can be difficult to find witnesses who are willing to testify.

Another challenge is the political sensitivity of the crime of aggression. States are often reluctant to prosecute individuals who are accused of committing the crime of aggression, because they fear that ng so could lead to reprisals or damage their diplomatic relations with other states.

Despite these challenges, there have been a number of successful prosecutions for the crime of aggression. In 2010, the ICC convicted Charles Taylor, the former president of Liberia, of aiding and abetting the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Sierra Leone. Taylor was the first head of state to be convicted by the ICC.

The crime of aggression is a serious violation of international law that has the potential to cause widespread death, destruction, and suffering. The legal framework for the crime of aggression is complex and evolving, and there are a number of challenges to prosecuting this crime. However, the successful prosecutions of Charles Taylor and other individuals have shown that it is possible to hold individuals accountable for the crime of aggression.

The continued prosecution of the crime of aggression is essential to deterring future acts of aggression and to upholding the rule of law.

The Crime of Aggression: The Quest for Justice in an Age of Drones, Cyberattacks, Insurgents, and Autocrats (Human Rights and Crimes against Humanity Book 36)

by Julio Franco Corzo

5 out of 5